February 27th, 2010
The American Benefits Council, the preeminent advocate of employer-sponsored benefit programs in Washington D.C., offers this prescriptions for health care reform – build on what works.

Fit for the Scrap Heap
Employer sponsored health insurance is not a system that works. I say that as a 25 year employee benefits professional.
Despite what its proponents say in its support, their actions tell a different story.
Employers want out.
And the numbers over the last 15 years show they are getting out.
They are dropping their health care plans. Fewer employers offer plans and those plans cover fewer employees. Read the rest of this entry »
3 Comments |
Employer health insurance, Health Care Reform |
Permalink
Posted by jimmy1920
February 20th, 2010
Wednesday, September 9th, President Barack Obama stood before the American people and a joint session of Congress and said:
If you are among the hundreds of millions of Americans who already have health insurance through your job, … nothing in this plan will require you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have. (Applause.) Let me repeat this: Nothing in our plan requires you to change what you have.
Someone will need to explain to me why this is a good thing.
The door may blocked
As the President was speaking these words, the 70 workers at SK Hand Tool Corp in Chicago, IL were without health insurance because their employer had made that decision for them. It had unilaterally stopped paying for health insurance for its employees.

An inviting portal
As the President was reassuring Americans that they could keep their health insurance, the employees of SK Hand Tools, represented by Teamsters Local 743, were starting the third week of a strike to keep their health insurance.
That strike would eventually last for ten weeks.
There is an overwhelming body of health policy research that supports the necessity of continuity of care to improve population health outcomes. Yet for most Americans, employment is not a continuous engagement.
Why do we build a system that relies on continuity on another system that flourishes on discontinuity?
2 Comments |
Economics of health care reform, Employer health insurance, Health Care Reform |
Permalink
Posted by jimmy1920
February 13th, 2010
An improved patient delivery system is a necessary pre-condition for affordable and quality health care.
What do I mean by a “patient delivery system”?
Understanding patient delivery system means recognizing that people without health insurance do not receive treatment until they are in an immediate life-threatening situation.
I cannot back this up with a scientific study, only my daily experience. But that experience contradicts an oft cited myth that no one who needs health care is turned away. One of the most common reason that people call our office is because something happened to their health insurance that lead to a denial of treatment. Read the rest of this entry »
7 Comments |
Health Care Reform |
Permalink
Posted by jimmy1920
February 8th, 2010
By Alexandra Thomas – Bloomberg.com
Feb. 4 (Bloomberg) — Health-care spending in the U.S. will almost double in 2019 to $4.5 trillion, or more than 19 percent of the economy, as unemployment and aging baby boomers drive up government costs, economists forecast.
Spending already jumped to $2.5 trillion, or 17.3 percent of the economy, in 2009, the economists from the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said in their yearly estimate, published today in the journal Health Affairs. The increase in share of gross domestic product, from 16.2 percent in 2008, was the biggest since record keeping began in 1960.
Health-Care Burden Shifts to U.S. Government as Spending Soars – Bloomberg.com
2 Comments |
News |
Permalink
Posted by jimmy1920
February 6th, 2010
You have heard the arguments.
In the first corner: “We have the best health care system in the world. People travel to this country from all over the world to get the best health care. the parking lots in hospitals bordering Canada are full of cars with Canadian license plates.”
In the second corner: “There are 100,000 deaths per year from hospital infections and a similar number from prescription drug errors, and an equally horrific number of people who need to be re-admitted to the hospital for complications. And what about “Never Events”, those medical errors that are described as adverse events that are unambiguous (clearly identifiable and measurable), serious (resulting in death or significant disability), and usually preventable.
And there is a voice in a third corner: “We have the most expensive health care system in the world yet the United States is not ranked among the top twenty nations in infant mortality, maternal mortality, longevity, or hospital admissions avoidable with access to health care.” Read the rest of this entry »
No Comments » |
Health care quality |
Permalink
Posted by jimmy1920