Monthly Archive for January, 2011

Job Killing? Through the Looking Glass

The charge that health care reform is a “job killing” measure is so fraught with intellectual dishonesty that it is hard to know where to begin.

Let’s start with the easy part – the half truth.

Ricardo Alonzo-Zaldivar offered this insight in The Huffington Post

A recent report by House GOP leaders says “independent analyses have determined that the health care law will cause significant job losses for the U.S. economy.”

It cites the 650,000 lost jobs as Exhibit A, and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office as the source of the original analysis behind that estimate. But the budget office, which referees the costs and consequences of legislation, never produced the number.

What follows is a story of how statistics get used and abused in Washington.

What CBO actually said is that the impact of the health care law on supply and demand for labor would be small. Most of it would come from people who no longer have to work, or can downshift to less demanding employment, because insurance will be available outside the job.

“The legislation, on net, will reduce the amount of labor used in the economy by a small amount _roughly half a percent_ primarily by reducing the amount of labor that workers choose to supply,” budget office number crunchers said in a report from last year.

Now I am not sure I follow the CBO’s logic in this case; but really, is this a bad thing? Continue reading ‘Job Killing? Through the Looking Glass’

Did you like this? Share it:

John Adams Signs Health Insurance Mandate

Thanks to Bob Cesca of the Huffington Post for this reminder of the historical precedent for the mandate to purchase health insurance.

Speaking of tri-corned hats, it’s worth noting here that the founding fathers, with whom the tea party and the Republicans claim political kinship, actually passed a law in 1798 that included a health care mandate and a socialized medicine plan. According to Forbes reporter Richard Ungar, “Congress passed — and President John Adams signed ‘An Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen.‘ The law authorized the creation of a government operated marine hospital service and mandated that privately employed sailors be required to purchase health care insurance.”

Why did the founding fathers hate America, with their government takeover of health care for seamen? The founding fathers clearly didn’t understand what the founding fathers intended with the Constitution, what with that evil mandate. Perhaps the founders should have met with the founders to discuss the superior wisdom of Cleon Skousen and Ayn Rand. Maybe symbolically dangled some tea bags from their actual tri-cornered hats.

And Cesca’s source for this insight, that notorious socialist rag, FORBES.

Did you like this? Share it:

SHAMEFUL!

Not one single Republican broke ranks with the fanatical wing of their party.
Every single Republican voted to deny health care coverage to young adults, to deny health insurance to sick people; to deny additional prescription drug coverae to those on medicare.

AND EVEN MORE SHAMEFUL!

Three Democrats joined thier ranks

Dan Boren (OK-2)
Mike McIntyre (NC-7)
Mike Ross (AR-4)

Did you like this? Share it:

Arizona Shootings, Mental Health, and Civility

The phrase “Arizona shootings” will forever be associated with Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) and with young Jared Loughner, and with even younger Christina Taylor Green.

The gunfight at OK Corral is history.

“Cousin-in-law” and author of the Nelson Report, Chris Nelson, described the incident as the “deadly intersection of three horrible moral and political dilemmas which are a genuine cancer in this country”.  Chris is not the only one to cite the contributing causes:

  1. The issue of access to effective treatment for mental disorders
  2. The lack of willpower to enact meaningful and rational gun control laws.
  3. The rising vitriol of US politics.

I will leave gun control to others and instead, focus on the intersection of the first and last.

Vitriol as culprit

Is the rising vitriol of US politics to blame?  I come down firmly in the camp of those who say yes? Continue reading ‘Arizona Shootings, Mental Health, and Civility’

Did you like this? Share it:

Too Much Health Care Insurance?

Can one have too much health care coverage?

Much of the debate for expanded health care coverage and for a single payer financing and delivery system arises out of concern for people without access to the traditional portals into the health care system: employment, old age, or poverty.

Abundance

But some people can have a whole lot of a good thing and still their medical bills fall through the cracks.

Take Dinah for example.

Consider the ways she had access to health care.

She was employed and had access to employer sponsored health insurance.

She was married and had access to health insurance as a dependent on her husband’s plan.

Her husband died and she became eligible for coverage as a survivor through her husband’s plan.

Her husband also had a retirement from a previous employer and she had access to coverage as a survivor on that plan.

She retired and had access to retiree health insurance from her employer.

She remarried and access to her second husband’s health insurance as a dependent.

She also had Medicare.

And still she could not get her bills paid.

There were mix ups in signing her up for some of those programs and the ones she was enrolled in could not decide which paid first, which was her primary insurance.  She came to us in tears, wanting to discard the insurance she had been paying for because it was “no good,” convinced her only option was to go on Medicaid.

Confusion reigns.

And even when people and systems have it right, confusion reigns.  Each year we get calls from people during Medicare Part D open enrollment?  They are confused and some of the vendors seem to offer extremely misleading and inaccurate information.  Why does it need to be so complicated.

Take Frank for example.

Frank was taking care of his older sister’s affairs.  She was in a nursing home and had access to Medicaid, Medicare Parts A and B and D and her retiree insurance with our plan.  Yet she could not get her prescriptions paid for.  Why?  It seems that the private pharmacy used by the nursing home did not know how to submit claims to any other payer than Medicaid.  That was straightened out.

But Frank made an astute observation.  He said each time he called one of these “pieces of the pie” as he called them, he would get a little bit more information.  He complained that each of the pieces barely understood their own role and no one understood how all of these pieces fit together.  “If they can’t see the whole picture, how do they expect an ordinary person like me to figure this out?”

Or the members who battle workers’ compensation in part to pay the medical bills for their work related injury and also to have income to pay the insurance premiums that pays for the medical bills for their non-work related medical bills.

Single payer is needed not just to provide for the have-nots, but also to bring order into a chaotic system for the haves.

Photo credit:    Stijn
Did you like this? Share it:

Archives

Bloggers - Meet Millions of Bloggers