Archive for the ‘Single payer’ Category

Vermont Reform: A Giant Step by a Small State

Has Vermont carved a path toward single payer health care or caved into powerful insurance company lobbies?

Maybe just a little bit of both.

Has Vermont drawn a new line in the sand for health care reform or outlined a sketchy drawing towards the future?

Yes to that as well.

On May 27th, 2011 Governor Peter Shumlin fulfilled a campaign promise to move the state toward a single payer health care system when he signed H-202.

As the saying goes, you can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.  In this case, the analogy works pretty well.

H-202 outlines a path that takes features from current state and federal realities and blends it with recipes offered by the federal health care reform to take Vermont where previous federal and state lawmakers have feared to tread. Continue reading ‘Vermont Reform: A Giant Step by a Small State’

Did you like this? Share it:

Romney Stands by Massachusetts Health Care Reform

Mitt Romney not backing away from the health care reform law that he pushed forward in Massachusetts.

In a speech he delivered in Ann Arbor, Michigan, the state where his father had been governor, the presidential aspirant went on to say that what was right for Massachusetts is not necessarily right for the rest of the country.

He then proceeded to trot out the tired Republican formulas for health care reform:  block grants to states, selling insurance across state borders, medical liability reform, and shifting more costs onto individuals.

I would have offered a different response for Mr. Romney.

The federal law on employee benefits, ERISA, ties the hands of states who want to expand health care coverage.  It’s called the ERISA preemption.  We came up with a solution that ducks the federal preemption.  It works in Massachusetts because Massachusetts has a high rate of unionization, a high rate of income and a very low rate of uninsured.  That is not a solution that could work in states like Texas or Mississippi that have none of those. Continue reading ‘Romney Stands by Massachusetts Health Care Reform’

Did you like this? Share it:

Faith Organizations Support Single Payer

The current health care system does not make life easy for lots of people and organizations.

Churches, for example.

The current issue of The Lutheran discusses the prospects for matching new pastors with congregations.   They do not specifically mention health care. They should.   The Lutherans are not unique.  They face the same challenges as other Protestant churches.

Congregations face declining worship attendance and, with that, declining offerings in the collection plate.  Senior pastors who saw their retirement savings seriously diminished during the recent recession, are staying on the job longer, reducing the number of vacancies.

Graduating seminarians, on the other hand, are graduating with larger debts.  They want and need more in a market of shrinking opportunites.

What does this have to do with health care?

How can a congregation save money?  Hire a minister who is married to a spouse with health insurance for the family.

Is that fair?

No.  Emphatically, no.

It limits the candidate pool for churches and it limits the opportunities for aspiring ministers.

Eleven faith organizations have endorsed a single payer solution to the health care crisis.  Most all offer theological reasons for their positions.  But churches should not shrink from their economic motives.

After all, they are in the exact same position as many small businesses and other non-profits.  Only 49% of private sector employees get their health care coverage from their employees.  Another 20%, of private sector employees get their coverage from their spouse.

The inability of too many employers to offer both competitive benefits and competitive salaries limits their candidate pool and restricts the opportunities of people who might otherwise be willing to work for those employers.

The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America should join with the other eleven faith organizations to support single payer.  It is not just the right thing to do theologically.  It is not just a social justice issue.  It is an economic issue that they share along with many other smaller organizations fighting for survival.

Photo credit     Truus, Bob & Jan, too

Did you like this? Share it:

Activist Judge Strikes Down Health Reform

Judge Roger Vinson, ruling for the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida, struck down the entire Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act (PPACA) as unconstitutional

He didn’t just strike down the individual mandate, he struck down the entire law.  He struck down the provision that allows young adults to stay on their parents’ health plan.  He struck down the provision that abolishes lifetime maximums.  He struck down the provision that allows sick people to buy health insurance.

From Judge Vinson’s ruling:

If, however, the statute is viewed as a carefully-balanced and clockwork-like statutory arrangement comprised of pieces that all work toward one primary legislative goal, and if that goal would be undermined if a central part of the legislation is found to be unconstitutional, then severability is not appropriate. As will be seen, the facts of this case lean heavily toward a finding that the Act is properly viewed as the latter, and not the former.

It has been the contention of the law’s supporters that the individual mandate is the lynchpin of the entire law.  Provisions regarding expansion of coverage to those with pre-exisitng medical conditions are not economically feasible in private competitive markets if the cost is not shared among both sick and health individuals.

The judge conceded  the centrality of the individual mandate and ruled that, therefore, the entire law must be struck down.

The Musket Mandate of 1792 and Health Care

The flaw in the law

The individual mandate is not the flaw in the law.  The flaw is the idea that the individual should be required to bear the full cost of insurance. Continue reading ‘Activist Judge Strikes Down Health Reform’

Did you like this? Share it:

Too Much Health Care Insurance?

Can one have too much health care coverage?

Much of the debate for expanded health care coverage and for a single payer financing and delivery system arises out of concern for people without access to the traditional portals into the health care system: employment, old age, or poverty.

Abundance

But some people can have a whole lot of a good thing and still their medical bills fall through the cracks.

Take Dinah for example.

Consider the ways she had access to health care.

She was employed and had access to employer sponsored health insurance.

She was married and had access to health insurance as a dependent on her husband’s plan.

Her husband died and she became eligible for coverage as a survivor through her husband’s plan.

Her husband also had a retirement from a previous employer and she had access to coverage as a survivor on that plan.

She retired and had access to retiree health insurance from her employer.

She remarried and access to her second husband’s health insurance as a dependent.

She also had Medicare.

And still she could not get her bills paid.

There were mix ups in signing her up for some of those programs and the ones she was enrolled in could not decide which paid first, which was her primary insurance.  She came to us in tears, wanting to discard the insurance she had been paying for because it was “no good,” convinced her only option was to go on Medicaid.

Confusion reigns.

And even when people and systems have it right, confusion reigns.  Each year we get calls from people during Medicare Part D open enrollment?  They are confused and some of the vendors seem to offer extremely misleading and inaccurate information.  Why does it need to be so complicated.

Take Frank for example.

Frank was taking care of his older sister’s affairs.  She was in a nursing home and had access to Medicaid, Medicare Parts A and B and D and her retiree insurance with our plan.  Yet she could not get her prescriptions paid for.  Why?  It seems that the private pharmacy used by the nursing home did not know how to submit claims to any other payer than Medicaid.  That was straightened out.

But Frank made an astute observation.  He said each time he called one of these “pieces of the pie” as he called them, he would get a little bit more information.  He complained that each of the pieces barely understood their own role and no one understood how all of these pieces fit together.  “If they can’t see the whole picture, how do they expect an ordinary person like me to figure this out?”

Or the members who battle workers’ compensation in part to pay the medical bills for their work related injury and also to have income to pay the insurance premiums that pays for the medical bills for their non-work related medical bills.

Single payer is needed not just to provide for the have-nots, but also to bring order into a chaotic system for the haves.

Photo credit:    Stijn
Did you like this? Share it:

Archives

Bloggers - Meet Millions of Bloggers