TPM, like the MSM, looks at the health care vote as – well as another vote.
This space asks the question – do they truly represent the interests of the residents in their districts.
Earlier I looked at a list of 85 Democrats who had not committed to supporting their party’s health care reform proposal.
Two -thirds represent districts with a health status index lower than their own states average and over half were below the national average.
So when the vote came on Sunday, did the wavering Democrats representing sicker districts vote for health.
Not exactly.
Three quarters – 75% -of the final 34 Democrats who voted NO on health care reform represent districts with a health status index below the national average and the same percentage represent districts with a health status index below their state’s average. When you combine the two, fully 85% of the Democrats voting no on health care reform are representing constituents with an average health status index below either their state or national average.
You have to wonder who are the Sickos.
The health status index is taken from the book, Measure of America, which uses a methodology developed in the United Nations to compare the well being of all Americans.

