Many U.S. employers to drop health benefits: McKinsey | Reuters

 CHICAGO | Tue Jun 7, 2011

(Reuters) – At least 30 percent of employers are likely to stop offering health insurance once provisions of the U.S. health care reform law kick in in 2014, according to a study by consultant McKinsey.

McKinsey, which based its projection on a survey of more than 1,300 employers of various sizes and industries and other proprietary research, found that 30 percent of employers will “definitely” or “probably” stop offering coverage in the years after 2014, when new medical insurance exchanges are supposed to be up and running.

“The shift away from employer-provided health insurance will be vastly greater than expected and will make sense for many companies and lower-income workers alike,” according to the study, published in McKinsey Quarterly.

Many U.S. employers to drop health benefits: McKinsey | Reuters

Health Care Reform – Scrap Employer Health Care

The American Benefits Council, the preeminent advocate of employer-sponsored benefit programs in Washington D.C., offers this prescriptions for health care reform – build on what works.

Fit for the Scrap Heap

Fit for the Scrap Heap

Employer sponsored health insurance is not a system that works.  I say that as a 25 year employee benefits professional.

Despite what its proponents say in its support, their actions tell a different story.

Employers want out.

And the numbers over the last 15 years show they are getting out.

They are dropping their health care plans.  Fewer employers offer plans and those plans cover fewer employees. Continue reading

Save This?

Earlier this summer President Obama said to the American Medical Association:

If you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan.  Period. No one will take it away.  No matter what.

Tell that to the 75 employees of SK Hand Tools represented by Teamsters Local 743.

SK Hand Tools  unilaterally terminated their health insurance.

strike

My congressman, Chris Van Hollen, recently held a telephone “town meeting” on health care.

He commented at the beginning that our current employer based system is the “foundation” of our current health care system.

If this is the foundation, something is about to topple. Continue reading

Near-term health trends familiar, irrespective of reform – Employee Benefit News

WEB EXCLUSIVE

By Kathleen Koster

August 4, 2009

As health reform grinds unevenly into congressional recess, employers are not waiting on Washington. Though they’re watching intently for reform to regain traction, life must go on and for many that means a continued shift of health insurance and prescription drug costs to employees, experts postulate…

According to Towers Perrin’s annual Health Care Cost Survey, average health care costs rose by 6% in 2009 and despite the rate of growth remaining on par, employers and their workers faced record-high costs this year. In flat dollar terms, gross health care expenditures rose by an average of $532 per employee, to an average total cost of $9,552.

Near-term health trends familiar, irrespective of reform – Articles – Employee Benefit News

Open Enrollment and Health Care Reform

Our plan just completed its annual open enrollment.  Members are permitted to change medical or dental plans; to add or remove dependents, and change life insurance options.

Open enrollments highlights certain flaws in our current system.

The logic of an open enrollment is compelling.  The object of any insurance is to spread the cost of any risk over time and over as many people as possible.  Open enrollment helps to spread the risk over time.

MazeThe risk of health care is different than other risks that we insure against.

We buy life insurance to insure against death; auto insurance to protect against an automobile accident; homeowners insurance to shield against damage to our home.

Those hazards (the technical term) generally occur without warning.  No one is likely to approach their insurance agent to buy auto insurance because they anticipate an auto accident in the near future.

Illness, on the other hand, can offer some warning.  Someone may experience symptoms and has not seen a doctor.  The doctor may have recommended expensive surgery.  Or maybe it’s just a young couple planning to start a family.

Open enrollment is the only opportunity that insurers have to spread risk over time.  By insisting that people enroll only during a specific time period, the insurer reduces the risk that someone is only enrolling because they know they have an approaching medical expense.

It may seem unfair to the person with an immediate and pressing need.  But to the others in the group who ultimately foot the bill, it makes perfect sense.  It is one reason why a mandate – an employer mandate or an individual mandate – makes sense.

Medicare has its open enrollment rules.  Their annual open enrollment for Medicare Part B is from January through March each year and is not effective until July 1 of that year. Continue reading